PLACER COUNTY EXPOSED ON INFOWARS.COM

  http://www.infowars.com/california-family-courts-sexual-abuse-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-2874253

The California Family Courts Sexual Abuse Industry

Editor’s Note: The following material is explicit and disturbing, but serves to expose a corrupt system of institutional child abuse – in this case by the State of California – through a system which is meant to protect vulnerable children, not push them further into a nightmare of abuse by criminals. Society must shine a flood light on our court system, foster care and violations by adult individuals who are using our institutions to hide their crimes against humanity.
BARBARA FARRIS
Ellis County Observer
December 7, 2011
The following summaries are a few selected samples of real California Family Law cases (catogorized by county), in which children are taken away from safe parents, and forced to live with abusive parents. Is this becasue the abuser is offered money to film his sexual abuse against the child so the judicial system gets a kick back? All involved would be local police, judges, children services, attorneys and even medical examiners.
You decide after reading the following, is $8 billion a year worth this type of corruption.
Amador County
When these children were four, seven and nine years old, they were taken from their mother who was accused of non-evidentiary Parent Alienation Syndrome, and placed in the full custody of their father. This occurred in 1996, after the two girls disclosed molest by their father, despite corroborative medical evidence, explicit disclosures of abuse to law enforcement, and receipt of California Victims of Crime funding for therapy due to the crime committed against them. They had a cluster of symptoms indicative of sexual abuse, including nightmares, encopresis, excessive fears, sexualized behavior, depression, dissociation, anger, physical pains, headaches, constipation, and stomach aches. The mother, found by the court to be a good, loving mother and not accused of any crime, has been on supervised visitation since the reversal of custody three years ago. The mother, bankrupt after spending $250,000, must represent herself in court against the father’s attorney. The children’s attorney functions as a de facto attorney for the accused perpetrator.
Contra Costa County
After disclosing molest by her father, this 11-year-old victim and her two siblings were forced to continue overnight, unsupervised visits with the identified perpetrator. The father admitted molesting his daughter and was convicted. Nevertheless, overnight visits were court ordered to continue. In 1997 the five-year-old daughter disclosed molest by the father. Unsupervised visits continued because the court determined the father was not able to pay a supervisor.

• A d v e r t i s e m e n t
• 
  

El Dorado County
In 1998 this 4-year-old boy was taken from his mother and given to his physically abusive father. He is barred from any contact from his mother.
Fresno County
This little girl, born in 1994, was taken away from her mother when she was a toddler, and placed with her father, despite her on-going disclosures of sexual abuse by the father. She had a cluster of symptoms indicative of sexual abuse including anger, phobias, eating problems, insomnia, constipation, headaches, nausea, regression, terror when her diapers were changed, night terrors, and attention problems. These problems increased when she was placed with the father, but the numerous reports to CPS have been to no avail. The child cries until she vomits when she leaves her mother on week-end visits and is forced to return to the father.
Los Angeles/Orange County (Torrance)
Born in 1988, this little girl was placed in the custody of her mother when she was five years old, seeing her violent father only in the presence of a court monitor. When she was seven, she was forced to see her father without a supervisor, and reported to professionals that he was sexually and physically abusing her. The abuse was corroborated by medical evidence. She had a cluster of symptoms indicative of sexual abuse including nightmares, night terrors, enuresis, encopresis, excessive fears of her mother dying, depression, suicide attempt, eating disorder, extreme dissociation, intense anger, flashbacks, physical pains, headaches, insomnia, nausea, diarrhea, constipation, stomach aches, and a learning disability. Rather than protecting her, Judge F. granted primary custody to her father. In Utah, where her mother had moved, physical and sexual abuse was substantiated and she received complete court protection. However, California regained jurisdiction and placed her with the father. The child, now 11, is only able to see her non-offending mother for 8 hours per month under supervised conditions.
These two children, a boy born in 1982 and a girl born in 1984, were in the full custody of their mother who was a victim of domestic violence. In 1989 and 1990, both children disclosed sexual abuse by the father. They had a cluster of symptoms indicative of sexual abuse, including lack of intact hymen, vaginal infections, nightmares and night terrors, enuresis and encopresis, phobias, sexualized behavior, depression, eating disorders, intense anger, headaches, and stomach aches. The mother was charged by the State of Georgia for not protecting the children from the father. The children received California Victims of Crime funding for therapy due to the crimes committed against them. However, in 1990 the California court took the children away from their mother and put them with the father’s family. The mother was placed on supervised visitation. In 1992 the father gained custody and hid the children from their mother. $36,000 back child support owed to the mother was erased, and the court doubled her payments of child support. In 1997 the mother was assaulted and injured in the courthouse by the father, who continued to terrorize her. The mother, a court monitor herself, was chosen “1995 Humanitarian of the Year” by her university.
Los Angeles County Superior Court
Born in 1987, this child began masturbating at school and reported sexual abuse by her father when she was seven years old. The Department of Children and Family Court Services (DCFS) concluded she had been sexually abused. She was placed in the custody of her mother, and saw her father on court-ordered supervised visits. The child repeatedly asked to be placed with her mother and consistently reported sexual molest by her father, even in court. Nevertheless, in she was taken away from her non-abusive mother and placed in the custody of her father on the recommendation of an evaluator. In 1994 DCFS filed another sexual-abuse petition against the father in juvenile court. However, the child remained in the custody of her father, despite having a court-appointed attorney who does not represent the wishes of the child. In 1998, the court cut off her off from all contact with her non-offending mother. Currently this severely learning-disabled child is allowed to see her mother only twice a week under supervised conditions. The mother is now bankrupt.
Los Angeles/Riverside County (Torrance Superior Court)
This child was raised by her mother who has never been accused of any crime. In 1998 she was taken away from her mother and legal father, and forced to live with a man whom she has continuously stated sexually abused her. She is allowed no contact with her mother, who has tried unsuccessfully to protect her.
Los Angeles County
This two-year-old girl disclosed sexual abuse by father, and was given to identified abuser. The mother is on supervised visits.
These small children were placed in the custody of their mother when they were nearly one and two years old. Their violent father was ordered to take a parenting class. A year later they were taken away from their mother and forced to live with their father. The judge stated he was only interested in the mother’s “alienation” (the mother was breast-feeding), and ignored police reports of the father’s domestic violence and history of DUI’s. The unemployed mother is ordered to pay child support of over $1200 per month to the multi-millionaire Israeli father (who obtained a green card through their marriage). The toddlers are being raised to speak only Hebrew and are only allowed scant contact with their mother, who cannot afford an attorney.
Born in 1990, this child made graphic disclosures of rape by his father, including group sex, to physicians, therapists, and detectives. He had a cluster of symptoms indicative of sexual abuse including sexualized behavior, depression, suicide attempt, eating disorder, extreme dissociation, intense anger, physical pains, headaches, insomnia, nausea, diarrhea, constipation, stomach aches, learning disability and attention problems. CPS did not protect him. The child’s attorney did not represent the child’s wishes. Despite saying that he wanted to live with his mother, he was forced to live with his identified perpetrator who then moved to Boston. He is rarely allowed to see his mother, and only with a supervisor.
Born in 1989, this child was taken from his mother after he disclosed that his father beat him when he was 4 years old. There was medical evidence of abuse. The child had a cluster of symptoms indicative of sexual abuse, including sexualized behaviors, depression, intense anger, nightmares and night terrors, headaches, stomach aches, bladder problems and enuresis, diarrhea, phobias, and attention problems. The boy stated he wanted to live with his mother, and instead was forced to live with his father. The child’s attorney does not represent the wishes of the child. The non-offending mother has spent approximately $85,000 and must represent herself in court.
Los Angeles (Long Beach and Concord)
This four-year-old child lived with his mother and 3 brothers in Long Beach after his parents separated in 1997. When the mother decided to move to Northern California, the judge ordered the child delivered to Southern California every week for visits in 1998. An evaluator recommended a change of custody to the father, despite the mother complying with the visitation schedule.
Marin County
This little girl reported sexual abuse, corroborated by 4 medical reports, by her father who physically abused and choked her mother unconscious. She was placed in the custody of her mother, a bank vice president, and saw her father only under supervised conditions. The father threatened and stalked them until the mother and child took refuge in a battered women’s shelter. The child was forced to visit her father without supervision, and was subsequently re-abused. Her mother was court-ordered not to take her to the doctor. The mother fled with her daughter to Europe in 1992, because she could not obtain protection for the child through California family law court. They were found 1½ years later, and the child was placed in the full custody of her father. Her mother went to prison for depriving the father visitation, is prohibited from contacting her daughter, and is ordered to pay the father $65,000 in restitution.
Mono County
In 1997, these five- and six-year-old brothers were taken away from their mother, amid allegations that the mother deliberately kept the youngest child sick. The five-year-old was subsequently hospitalized when the father did not take care of his illness. The father threatened suicide at the hospital, and had to be subdued, disarmed and taken to a psychiatric hospital by police. Subsequently, the boys were placed in foster care. The five-year-old, who suffered from a rare blood sugar disease, became fatally ill and died after social worker and foster parents failed to provide appropriate medical care, in spite of the mother’s pleas. The older boy is forced to live with his father, despite his statement that he wants to live with his mother, and statements by his older sister to CPS about sexual abuse by their father. He is only allowed to see his non-offending mother with a court monitor. The mother has won 3 wrongful death lawsuits against the father and the county totaling over $800,000.
Placer County
This child, when she was 6 years old, was ripped from her mother’s arms and given into the custody of her father whom she had reported molested her. She begs to come to live with her mother, who has spent several hundred thousand dollars trying to protect her.
Plumas County
Born in 1994, this little girl began disclosing sexual abuse when she was only 1½ years old. She identified her father as the perpetrator. She eventually told a doctor, counselor and school teacher about the abuse. She had a cluster of symptoms indicative of sexual abuse, consisting of nightmares, night terrors, sexualized behavior, enuresis, fear of her father, depression, eating disorder, dissociation, extreme anger, physical pains, headaches, insomnia, nausea, and stomach aches. Despite documentation of the sexual abuse to the court, she is forced to stay unsupervised with her father. The child’s attorney does not represent his client’s wishes. The mother has spent approximately $150,000 trying to protect her child and is now without an attorney. She has not seen her child.
Sacramento County
This boy, born in 1990, was placed in the custody of his mother after to his parents divorce, with overnight visits with his father. When he was less than two years old, he began reporting on-going sodomy by his father. He had a cluster of symptoms indicative of sexual abuse, including rectal bleeding, nightmares, night terrors, enuresis, encopresis, sexualized behavior, depression, extreme dissociation, intense anger, flashbacks, physical pains, insomnia, diarrhea, and stomach aches. The child disclosed the abuse to 5 teachers, family physician, therapists, police, family and friends. There were over 62 reports of suspected abuse in 7 years. Child Protective Services investigated and substantiated 7 reports of child sex abuse. The child wrote and talked to the judge, asking to live with his mother and grandmother. Instead, the court repeatedly placed him in the custody of his identified perpetrator. He called 911 for help from his father’s house, and his therapist called the police to help him, and was put into expensive private foster care, rather than with his non-offending mother. He was able to stay with his mother while she was dying. Four months after her death, he was forcibly removed from his non-offending grandmother’s care by armed police. He was placed in expensive foster care again for over six months, and is now forced by Juvenile Court to live with his identified perpetrator permanently. The child’s attorneys did not represent his wishes, and functioned as de facto attorneys for the accused perpetrator.
This child, born in 1986, had nightmares and medical evidence of sexual abuse at age 4 ½ years, and identified her father as the perpetrator. The judge ordered that the father’s new wife supervise the visits. The child again disclosed molestation. CPS and the sheriff’s department placed her in the Children’s Receiving Home. After a 6 month investigation and UC Davis Medical Center examinations, the little girl was placed with her mother, and the father was not allowed visits. During reunification, the therapist recommended unsupervised visits. The mother fled with the child to Canada to protect her from further abuse. They were found after 11/2 years and the mother was put in jail. The child was forced to live with her identified perpetrator and did not see her mother for six years. She is currently being treated for suicide attempts and alcoholism.
These two boys were taken from their mother and given to their father when they were 12 and 15 years old, after they reported that their father abused them and threatened suicide. The father had brutally abused the mother during the marriage. When the boys asked their mother to motion the court to remove their court-appointed attorney who was threatening them, the judge gave guardianship of the boys to that attorney. The children protested being removed from their mother, pleaded with the judge and evaluator, refused to get on the airplane to be sent to another state, and were forced to go to live with the father. The younger child ran away from his father’s home and cannot be found.
These three children reported sexual molestation by the father to numerous professionals. Physical evidence of the abuse was found for all three, and the children had psychological symptoms of nightmares, school phobias, eating disorders, and suicidal ideation. Both parents have equal time with the children due to evaluator recommendations.
In 1996 this 3 ½ year old child, who lived in the custody of her mother, stated she was being touched by her father inappropriately during visits. The recommendation from the mediator was to have supervised visits, but the evaluator denied the molest, did not gather evidence, misquoted parties, and recommended 50/50 custody. The child again disclosed molest. When the judge still refused to provide supervised visits, CPS in another county took the child into protective custody and supervised visits were ordered. However, Sacramento County took jurisdiction and the evaluator said the mother had Parent Alienation. The judge forced both the girl and her brother to live with their father, despite ordering the father to attend anger control classes.
This little boy had speech problems, frequent ear infections and leg pains, nightmares, enuresis, fears and phobias. The mother divorced the physician father (who was in treatment for addiction to pornography) due to his violence and alcohol abuse. During the divorce proceedings, a custody evaluation report was written which the mother was not allowed to see. The father demanded custody of the child. The mother’s attorney said she would lose all parental rights if she did not accede to the demand. She acceded and the child is now allowed to see his non-offending mother only under supervised conditions, despite the child’s statements that his father abuses him.
This child reported sexual abuse by the father to numerous professionals. The child had medical and psychological evidence of sexual abuse, yet was required to visit the father unsupervised, due to evaluator’s recommendations.
This child reported sexual abuse by the father. CPS investigation confirmed the abuse and there was medical evidence of sexual abuse. The child was required to visit the father unsupervised, due to the evaluator’s recommendations.
San Bernardino County
In 1993 this child’s mother divorced her father due to his physical abuse of the child. After a visit with her father, the child reported physical and sexual abuse. There was medical evidence of genital warts, bruises and welts. In 1995 after an evaluation, the mother was ordered to bring the child to court. The court forced the child to live with her identified perpetrator father. After the evaluation was overturned in a peer review, the child was placed half time with her mother. The evaluator did another report in 1997, and again recommended the child be placed with her father. After the child told her mother that she wanted to commit suicide, she was not allowed to see her mother at all. Now she may see her non-offending mother only with a court monitor present.
Born in 1989, this child was placed in the custody of his mother when he was 20 months old. His father had physically abused his mother for 9 years. The child returned from visits with the father with bruises, black eyes, a raw penis, headaches, ear aches, stomach aches and throat infections. At age 4, he had sexualize behavior, masturbation, nightmares, night terrors, enuresis, depression, dissociation, insomnia, nausea, and attention problems. The child tried to jump out of a moving car when he had to return to his father. The evaluator ignored hospital reports and police reports. The court gave full custody to the father in 1995, despite the child’s stated desire to stay with his mother. Four months later he again disclosed sexual abuse to 12 professionals and 3 CPS workers. Nevertheless, the court forced him to remain in his father’s custody, and has denied him any visits with his mother. The mother is now bankrupt.
These seven and ten year old children reported physical and sexual abuse by father. The father received full custody and mother is on supervised visits once per week when she can afford it.
San Diego County
Born in 1987, this child reported sexual abuse to his pediatrician when he was six years old. He had sexualized behavior, fears of his mother dying, depression, flashbacks, physical pains, headaches, insomnia, and stomach aches. He has a medical condition called Williams Syndrome in which his body ages rapidly, but he is younger in many ways than his biological age. In 1988 he and his mother had moved to a battered woman’s shelter due to violence in the home. He stated he wanted to live with his mother, a teacher. Instead he is forced by the court to live with his violent father who had been convicted of DUI and stealing, and is permanently disabled with mental disability. The father moved the child to another state, and sees his mother only a few times per year. The child’s attorney did not represent the child’s wishes.
After a short marriage this child’s parents separated in 1986. Custody of the one year old child was given to the mother. He returned from visits with the father with genital irritation. At age 2 ½ he disclosed genital touching by the father, and at age 3 ½ he displayed sexually precocious behavior to a therapist, and a deep bruise on his genitals. An evaluation was ordered. The evaluator recommended full custody to the father. The mother left the state with the child to protect him from further abuse. 1 ½ years later the mother and child were apprehended. Both old and new abuse evidence was suppressed in court, through the efforts of a social worker. Although there was medical evidence of sexual abuse and evidence of abuse by the father from another victim, full custody was given to the father and the mother was placed on supervised visits. The child continued to disclose abuse. The father moved to another state, and the mother’s visits have been thwarted.
In 1993 this three year old child began to reveal she was sexually abused by her father. The family court refused to consider any evidence of sexual abuse and ordered “molest cannot be an issue in this case”. Unsupervised visits, and later temporary custody with the father, were ordered in 1994. An evaluator recommended that the child be removed from the mother’s house due to “severe parental alienation.” The mother was placed on supervised visits, and is now allowed weekends with the child. The evidence of molest is overwhelming, as testified to by 3 psychologists, a police investigator, an expert in child sexual abuse allegations, tape recordings of the child’s disclosures, sexual acting out, photographs of the father naked with the child on his lap, and medical evidence of labial adhesions. . The attorney for the child does not listen to the child’s wants, but indicates he is doing what is “best” for the child. The police determined probable cause, but the District Attorney declined to prosecute the father. This child ran away from her father’s home.
San Luis Obispo County
Born in 1994, this child disclosed that he was being molested by his father when he was nine years old. He told counselors, CPS, and police, and had symptoms of nightmares, night terrors, enuresis and encopresis, excessive fears of men and anger, sexualized
Follow full story below:
Part 1: http://www.elliscountyobserver.com/?p=35658
Part 2: http://www.elliscountyobserver.com/?p=35662
Part 3: http://www.elliscountyobserver.com/?p=35666

EVERYONE COME MARCH AGAINST JUDICIAL CORRUPTION WITH US

Our objective is to bring attention and media to expose all types of judicial corruption by marching on the state capitol here in Sacramento. The system is purposely putting children with abusers and child molesters for profit. Please come march and support our cause to grab media attention. Please share this event and bring your friends! BREAK THE SILENCE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ABUSE.   As many of you already know, Mother's of Lost Children and a few other organizations are marching at the Capitol in Washington D.C on Mother's Day, May 8, 2011 and on May 9, 2011.    There are many moms here in California who would love to be there but, due to financial or other considerations, can't travel to Washington D.C. this May.  For this reason, a group of moms has decided to organize a march right here at our own CA State Capitol on May 9th.  Our mission is to bring attention to the issue of how our broken family and juvenile court systems are harming children all over our state.   So far, we are still in the planning stages but we have applied for a permit to assemble at the Capitol on May 9, 2011 from 10 am to 7 pm.  We would like to start of with a prayer and then march around the Capitol and maybe up to the appellate court.   Speaker Pro Tempore Fiona Ma has graciously agreed to speak at our event and her assistant has applied for a committee room from 3pm to 5pm that day.  We also sent a request to Assemblyman Jim Beall to speak regarding PAS and how it's use in family court harms children but haven't heard back regarding his availability.  We would also like to assemble a panel of experts: attorneys, investigators, child abuse experts, judges, domestic violence experts, psychologists, authors, etc.. to speak as well.  If you have contacts who may be willing to participate in our expert panel, please pass along their contact info.  We would also like to have a survivor's panel comprised of those of us who have survived or are currently surviving (somehow) abuse by a perpetrator of DV or child abuse AND abuse by the family or juvenile court system.  If you are a survivor and would like to participate and/or speak at our rally- Please contact me ASAP.  After the panels and speakers, I would like to have everyone assemble once again in front of the Capitol for a closing prayer and "candlelight vigil" or moment of silence.  I realize that in May, it won't really be dark enough for candlelight before 7 pm but it's the thought that counts.  Also, open flames are not allowed so we would have to use glow-sticks or battery operated devices anyway.    We need lots of help to make this a huge success!   What we need right now:   Your thoughts and suggestions A slogan A flier The support of our local non-profit organizations with anti domestic violence and anti child abuse agendas Lots and lots of media attention Experts for our panel Survivors willing to participate in a panel and/or speak Signs and banners Survivors from each county and their supporters to join our march Please contact me ASAP so that we can start to organize everything and make this a super event that will send a strong message to our lawmakers and the courts in our state!   Our goal is at least 1000 people!  Lets show our lawmakers and the public that this is a serious issue and a widespread problem!

Connie Bedwell's Polygraph Regarding Dustin Thompson Molesting Their Daughter: SaveAaliyah.com

THIS IS CONNIE BEDWELL'S POLYGRAPH BELOW. WE WANT TO KNOW WHERE DUSTIN THOMPSON'S POLYGRAPH IS AND WHY HE REFUSES TO TAKE ONE SINCE HE FALSELY CLAIMS HE IS INNOCENT? YOU'D THINK THE AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT WOULD MAKE HIM TAKE ONE AND END THIS NIGHTMARE FOR AALIYAH. PLEASE SEND THIS LINK AROUND TO DIFFERENT MEDIA OUTLETS AND BOMBARD THE PLACER COUNTY  CALIFORNIA AUTHORITIES, FBI, ATTORNEY'S GENERAL AND GOVERNOR FOR CORRUPTION.

 Connie's examination was performed by a retired Law Enforcement Officer, now PI and Polygrapher. There is a typo on page 2 that should say Aaliyah's behavior regressed in mid '2007' (not 2006). The specific questions asked are not listed, the polygrapher will have to be questioned. But we will say that not only did Connie clear herself and others through the questions asked but all evidence points directly at the perpetrator, Dustin Thompson. We want to see the child molester take a polygraph, but we know he wont step near one. Connie is willing to take a polygraph with the FBI regarding any matter involving the lies spouted from Court personnel, Sergeant Pecoraro and others with dirty hands in this case. Save Aaliyah.

John and Tanya Bartsch: Fraud, Death Threats and Vindictive Lies: One of Pecoraro's Missing "Puzzle" Pieces in Bedwell Case

The Truth About: “The Truth About Connie”

Before I continue this post, I have the need to say that I have not been given any consent from the mother to post any of what I have written or what I am about to write. I would do nothing to jeopardize this mother’s plight to save her daughter, but I feel that it is my constitutional right of freedom of speech to dispute all the blatant lies regarding this case and the mother going around on the internet. I have access to the court documents; I have read them and now in a series of articles will post the truth and facts of this whole debacle.

I was in the middle of reading the court documents, researching for the second article of facts in the baby A case when I read “thetruthaboutconnieblogspot”. I have to say that I laughed out loud while reading. I will tell you in just a minute why it was so funny to me. The “interview” of this “friend” is a fraud. The author of that blog is lying when they tell you they “spoke” to a “friend” of the mother’s. If this person was such a friend, why did they not disclose the name? Because those are the words from Tanya Bartsch in a letter she wrote to Dr. Roeder, the “doctor” that evaluated the family for the court proceedings. I have this letter in my hands and am waiting to see if we can maybe upload it to saveaaliyah.com or if I may have permission to upload it here. If it will hinder the upcoming trial in any way, I will not post it at all. So as it stands right now, you’ll have to take my word for it. This letter is why I laughed out loud. Did the author of the blog not know that people have access to these court documents and can and will prove them to be liars? Obviously not.

As we all know, or maybe not, Tanya Bartsch is the woman that stole Connie’s identity and committed fraud against her. We also know that her husband, John, left threatening voicemails stating “they will bury Connie and make sure she loses her child”. There is also another letter from Connie’s current boyfriend of two and a half years explaining more of the despicable vile things they described they would do to Connie and her child for reporting them for their crimes. It explains how they would do anything to hurt this mother and child’s relationship for revenge and this letter helped in doing just that. I will agree to one thing that the author of the blog spot wrote, where they wrote that Tanya loves Connie. Tanya loved Connie so much that she wanted to BE Connie. Anything that Connie did, said, wore…..Tanya copied. Connie was in a terrible car accident and Tanya would “all of a sudden” come down with the same symptoms Connie sustained in that accident. I have been told that Tanya was diagnosed as having Munchausen by Proxy, which I find VERY odd; because she does not have any children. I can’t say that was the exact diagnosis, but I do know that she had to have cognitive therapy for a minimal of two years and was placed on medication for her delusions. I can only assume that she has the symptoms that a doctor looks for in order to diagnose that syndrome. And isn’t it convenient that the people, the father supporters, have claimed that this mother has MBPS? Yes, I’d say very convenient.

I have also had the liberty of receiving some of the inside information from Connie’s counselor. Connie has been in counseling for the past year and a half to help cope with her situation with the Placer County corruption and the sexual/physical abuse of her daughter. This counselor defines the mother as “a black and white, left-brained logical thinker that does not live in the grey. Meaning, there are no “ifs, ands, or buts”, it’s either right or wrong. In other words, lacking of delusion.” These are words of her therapist not of a “friend” who has no knowledge of the psychosis of another. Not from a “friend” who wants to “bury” this mother because she turned her in for fraud. She’s just a mother that is trying to cope with the loss of her daughter, the loss of her daughter’s innocence, her motherhood, the trauma of the abuse, fighting a corrupt system and the toll it is taking on her. The mother’s pain is surely unimaginable.

Not only does her counselor say this about the mother, but her current boyfriend, ex-boyfriend, Dustin Thompson, sisters, brother, father and friends all say the same thing: “Honest, moral, caring, trustworthy, funny and intelligent.” This is all documented in the witness letters and court documents at saveaaliyah.com. Please, if you haven’t had a chance to read them yet, do so now. You can also go here: http://s576.photobucket.com/albums/ss207/SavebabyA/

Regarding the intelligence of this mother, I have personally read the mother’s psychological evaluation. According to the California Court System, Connie’s IQ places her in the top 1/3 of the population. It also states that her problem solving skills are well above average; she is not in denial and is definitely equipped to be a custodial parent.

It is sad to see that these people claim that Connie is vindictive. It is clear to me, that these father supporters are the ones being vindictive. They will go to any lengths to make us all believe that this mother has mental problems and is indeed delusional. I must admit, if I did not have the court documents to read myself, I would have to believe the author of that blog. Author, you are correct when you say there are two sides to the coin. But in your case, your coin has two faces or two tails. Your coin only spins and flips to one side. Post the truth and you will go far.

I do also want to touch on the unconstitutional restraining order placed on this mother. A poster said that Connie may lose all rights to her daughter for non-contact with her daughter for the last 4 months. But what the public does not know is that Dustin has named the baby in the restraining order prohibiting Connie to call, write or send any gifts to her own child. In every sense of the word has control over this baby and the mother. People, open your eyes!!! If the post were true it is disgusting how it’s a catch twenty-two. And to Connie’s lawyer, file for the ex parte ASAP, GET VISITATIONS STARTED IMMEDIATELY!!!

My fists are now up and clenched for the long fight. Thank you to all who read and I will now continue the article about the so called investigation.

Troy

AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT'S SERGEANT PECORARO'S LIES EXPOSED

Let me start un-weaving the web of deceit and deception for the sake of this baby and the mother. There are numerous letters and documents on HTTP://WWW.SAVEAALIYAH.COM that tell the story of this insidious injustice. There are court documents that are not uploaded for all to see, I would assume in the hopes that a trial will soon be heard. I have seen the court file, and what there is to read is all factual and real. Still, to this very day, I cannot find a lawful reason why this baby has been taken away from her protective mother. For all that there is to read there are definite subjects that stand out: 1. Sergeant Pecoraro 2. Lack of attorney for mother throughout the case 3. Lies from Amara (Father’s attorney) 4. Inconsistencies from the father 5. The mother refused to stop advocating for her child when repeatedly told to stop reporting the allegations 6. Numerous people not doing their jobs 7. Corruption and malfeasance 8. Lack of education/knowledge of abusers 9. Lack of proper and immediate action. 10. The fact the word “delusional” is constantly being used to describe this mother when clearly everyone around her says she is not.

Let’s start with Sergeant Pecoraro:

I am not a detective, but common sense, truth and evidence play a very important role in an investigation. Common sense would say to gather all the evidence, review it, interrogate the suspects, weigh all the information, consider the witnesses statements, ask all the pertinent questions and make an informed decision on the case. Does that sound about right to you all? I hope you all agree. It seems that Sergeant Pecoraro is lacking in the common sense department, to put it kindly. After reviewing these documents, I ponder how a detective can make a decision regarding his suspect without actually reading the documents/letters, viewing the videos or speaking to all of witnesses of this case. Oh, my apologies, he spoke with the father’s witnesses. But 5 months into the “investigation”, not one of the mother’s witnesses were called and asked to come in for an interview. Why wouldn’t the detective call the mother’s counselor? He could have obtained important information such as the mother’s mental condition, if she has symptoms of an abused woman, if she is consistent with her emotions and stories; the list goes on. Why wouldn’t he contact all of the doctors involved? The chiropractor has never been contacted, the one the child saw after being kicked in her back in early 2008. Sergeant Pecoraro claims to have interrogated the father, but what questions could he have asked him at that point in time? Did he ask “Are you molesting and beating your daughter?” What would anyone say to that, let alone a skilled manipulator and liar?

The investigation was opened in late January/early February 2008 after the baby came home to her mother with a bruise across her lower back and forehead stating her “mad daddy kicked her in the back and bonked her head on the table.” This was also the same time frame in which the child made her first sexual assault disclosures of her “daddy hurting pee pee and butt.” An MDIC interview was conducted in February 2008 and unsurprisingly, the threatened and frightened 2 year old baby did not speak. For those of you who do not know what an MDIC is, it is where they place the victim in a room with a stranger to be questioned in front of a glass window where the other professionals can watch. It is videotaped for prosecution purposes.
It is documented by the mother in the court file and pediatrician records that the first signs of sexual abuse were already a concern in late 2007. It is documented that the child’s behavior abruptly changed in early spring of 2007. The mother went to the Auburn Police Department to report incidents both in late 2007 and early 2008. In February she also went to the court house to file another restraining order (one of four restraining orders filed against the father). From the time the sexual abuse symptoms started to the disclosures documented; it took the baby roughly 9 months to be brave enough and able to tell her mommy. The baby’s vocabulary, at that time, was minimal. I find it strange how the professionals would expect a baby to then tell a stranger in an MDIC interview about sexual abuse when it took the baby roughly 9 months, depending on when the sexual abuse began and her ability to speak began, for her to tell someone she trusts and loves.

From January to June 2008 only the father’s witnesses were contacted, so let’s skip forward to June of 2008. In June, the mother was turned away from the Auburn Police Department when she brought the “Daddy’s Worm” video in on her camera. There was still an open investigation and they TURNED HER AWAY. Auburn Police Department made her turn the baby over to the father that same day for visitations, ignoring the mother’s desperate pleas and the video. THEY DID NOT WATCH IT! There is no reason as to why they did not view that video. Especially when they specifically told the mother to videotape the child when she spoke of what her father was doing. Who, in their right mind, would send away a mother who is crying, distraught and pleading with them to listen to her about what her baby is saying while there is an open investigation? The words biased, corruption and malfeasance are ringing in my ears. Where is their ethic code “To Serve and to Protect”? I see it as they served the mother with a restraining order to silence her and are protecting this father.
Keep in mind, the baby has claimed her “daddy hurt her pee pee and butt” and she had a bruise on her back and forehead. The baby stated that her mad daddy kicked her and she bonked head on the table. There were other disclosures also documented from the baby between January to June 2008 that you can find on the mother’s time line on saveaaliyah.com through the CPC link. Just know there are 11 other reported incidents and or disclosures made to CPS and not only reported by the mother. I will have to dig into that aspect for you all in a later article. In June 2008 after the baby was returned to the mother after visitation with the father for five days, she suspected abuse again and took the baby to the hospital. Sergeant Pecoraro was contacted by the emergency room doctor and refused the baby to be seen; he then asked to speak with the mother. He screamed at her to go home and he did not authorize the examination. What reason was given? None. Nothing. Nada. Just WHAT was this detective trying to do? I cannot, with good conscience, believe he knew that this baby was being abused and kept turning the mother away. There is something we are missing. But what? What is it that was told to the detective in order for him to have such disdain for this woman? From my understanding there was a screaming match over the phone in the hospital between the mother and detective. The mother was beyond upset at the rude, cold demeanor of this detective. He should have been gathering evidence for the investigation but instead shrugged her off. She knew none of her witnesses had been contacted in 5 months. Through questioning the detective, the mother found out that he had not even watched the 27 minute daddy’s worm video yet. If I were the mother my blood would have been boiling at this detective. It sounds backwards to me that the mother had to interrogate the detective! The mother’s boyfriend, Darrel Payne, decided to call and interrogate the detective and gave Sergeant Pecoraro a number of important key facts to the case that Pecoraro refused to obtain (read Darrel’s letter on saveaaliyah.com). In short, Pecoraro had told Darrel that a few of Connie’s friends already told him that she was coaching the child and the case was closed. This is the reason that the baby is now with her abusive father. Darrel, knowing the Bartsch’s for 15 years and being involved as a witness to the Bartsch’s lists of felonies, had already known who the detective was speaking of. A number of the Bartsch’s threats were made directly to Darrel and left on his voice mail. After Darrel’s heated discussion with Pecoraro informing him of more information he hadn’t gathered, Pecoraro FINALLY managed to make it a priority to watch the “daddy’s worm” video numerous days after it was given to APD. He then called and apologized to the mother for his deficiency of doing his job along with being outright rude to her on the phone at the hospital. He FINALLY scheduled the second MDIC interview for the child, but only after he had already placed the child back in the father’s home where she could have been brainwashed and abused again. The MDIC was weeks after the child disclosed about “daddy’s worm.” Essentially this “puzzle” as Pecoraro named it in the Auburn Journal, consists of 3 general sections: The Father’s witnesses, The Mother’s witnesses and The Evidence. Second graders could understand that Sergeant Pecoraro indeed did not “immediately,” nor properly, handle this case like he claims in the Auburn Journal. Undoubtedly, Sergeant Pecoraro nullified the evidence before it even had a chance. He placed this child back in her father’s home to be brainwashed before her interview, denied authorization to gather hard evidence, didn’t immediately watch the video, didn’t immediately put an EPO (Emergency Protective Order) to ensure protection of the child and didn’t contact the mother’s witnesses to get the other side to the story before he decided to interrogate the suspect. On top of that, what should have been him interrogating the mother, she reports he had his back towards her in his cubicle with his contact list up on his computer screen containing all father’s witnesses only. Two thirds of Sergeant Pecoraro’s puzzle has done a disappearing act here.

Allow me to recap the problem here for you, readers. The definition of “immediately” in Pecoraro’s terms must be, ignore a mother pleading to protect her baby after the baby disclosed about daddy’s worm, place the baby back in the father’s care for visitation for more brainwashing and abuse, decline getting any hard evidence at the emergency room, yelling at the distraught young woman after she hears her daughter tell a story of a living nightmare of her daddy’s yucky worm, he then watches the “daddy’s worm video” and then uses the father’s brainwashing of the child against her. If he would have done is job correctly, he may have had the significant keys to unlocking his “puzzle.” It is crucial and necessary to know the things the child had been saying beforehand because of what she might have said in her interview after being placed back in the father’s home. Especially, since the mother and aunt describe the baby repeating, like a broken record or mocking bird, “Mommy makes me say these things, I love Daddy, I love daddy’s worm, daddy said so” after the baby being returned to them from the father’s visitation. Those statements are completely opposite of what the baby was saying in the 27 minute video. They are shorter and in my opinion more believable as coached statements. Incredibly, plenty of details were not equated into the puzzle.

The felonies committed by Tanya and John Bartsch are clearly documented in the police reports done by adequate detectives of the Rocklin and Roseville Police Departments which contain imperative details to the Bedwell and Thompson case as well. The police report itself proves Tanya and John Bartsch’s credibility or better yet, lack thereof. It proves they premeditated and vindictively went to the Auburn Police Department with fabricated witness letters to the court, doctors and police. These letters are dated immediately following the date of their committed felonies. There is a new article posted about Ms Bedwell that has blatant lies to the public about her. I’m here to call out those lies. I have a copy of Tanya Bartsch’s fabricated letter. The statements used in the slanderous article about the mother are straight out of Tanya’s letter. The article clearly states the “friend” is not Tanya Bartsch. I ask the author of that article, then why the need to tell us it wasn’t from her? Traces of guilt possibly? Those statements in that article are lies. What credibility does the rest of that article have then? John and Tanya threatened to do anything to have Connie’s child taken from her. These criminals apparently are still at it and those of us with common sense can assume it’s because there is a police report proving their lies for the world to see. I can also confirm the mother does in fact have a doctor’s note, it’s reported she was in bed for a total of 9 days sick with the flu, and that would be the real reason she missed court recently.

Sergeant Pecoraro, lacking necessary detective abilities, thought when these two criminals, John and Tanya Bartsch who we know maliciously conned him and in combination with the results of the MDIC interview of the child; (where we are assuming that the child said the brainwashed comments she was stating to the mother and sister after being placed back in the father’s home), that it concluded the case again for a second time. By second time, I mean that he had already told Darrel Payne there was nothing left for him to review, yet there indeed was. He has closed the case again. It is apparent there is indeed more to review again otherwise all of the mother’s witnesses wouldn’t be claiming they were never contacted and the baby wouldn’t still be stating and exhibiting behaviors the way she is in the visitation reports. Hopefully by the third time this case closes it will be closed properly. They say the third time’s a charm.

So, the court then gives full custody to the father. 10 months of supervised visitations with the mother went by. In these visitations, the child was still disclosing signs of abuse through her play. The child tells her mother a number of consistent statements matching the mother’s story that you can read for yourselves in the reports on saveaaliyah.com. The mother claims the father realized the baby was still speaking of the abuse even after his threats to her. Dustin Thompson requested from the judge to have her visitations stopped. His request was denied which ruined his plans. Therefore, he found a way to attain his goal through finagling the visitation facility. The mother reports the father doesn’t want evidence to be documented against him through visitation reports. The reports prove all the father’s claims to be untrue.

This mother has been out of the puzzle for over a year. Yet, the puzzle is still missing pieces. How is that possible if the case was closed and solved? The child is talking about her tongue hurting, reacting negatively to nudity of dolls, claiming how mad her daddy is, clinging to her mommy, refusing the bathroom, claiming statements that the mother is scary and that someone made her say that, she’s still mentioning death and the burying of her toys all right there in those visitation reports. Great work Sergeant Pecoraro. One can only hope that you would go to your commanding officer, tell him/her of your mistakes in the “investigation,” ask for it to be re-investigated and do it properly this time. John and Tanya Bartsch saying the mother coached this little girl is absurd. The baby spoke an entire 27 minutes on her own. Please right your wrongs, for the sake of this baby ONLY!

This case is a nightmare from beginning to end. From what’s been reported to me, I blame the majority of this disaster on this detective. Everybody was counting on him, who should be aware of such charming manipulative criminals to not speak the truth in this case, but he failed miserably. Justice is crying in the streets for this baby. This child does not deserve to suffer for others ignorance and pride.
There are more articles to be written involving the Placer County D.A., Placer County CPS, abuse in general, child molester’s tactics and more facts on the way. To inform the readers, there is a descriptive time line to all of these details mentioned. I decided to leave exact dates and times out for the sake of a trial. Child molesters are intelligent creatures and I do not want to jeopardize the case for this child and mother by providing too much information to give any opportunity for more alibis to be invented by the unjust. The time line is well put together and matches all dates and time frames of the mother’s witnesses, claims and her court declarations; I’m afraid that this is not a delusional woman, but that of a delusional county.

Thank you to all who read. I hope to get the facts out here fast enough to get this case into the right hands where someone can erupt the Placer County corruption wide open and to get this baby back into her protective mother’s arms.

Troy (re-posted with permission of Troy)

SAVE AALIYAH FROM "DADDY'S (DUSTIN THOMPSON'S) WORM"

 Above is a picture of the Baby Einstein's Worm. There is also a green and orange worm in one of the videos of Baby Einstein that resembles more of a dinosaur which is the worm Aaliyah also relays information about due to her fears of all worms. What would cause a child to fear all worms? Aaliyah began to be afraid of all worms when the sexual abuse began. She became afraid of the dark, afraid of her bed, regressed in potty training, began to think the world was dangerous, needed a flashlight and nightlight to sleep with and began having extremely bad nightmares that would keep her awake at night. The child molester wants to try to convince anybody that he can that “Daddy’s Worm” is anything but his penis. So right here we will rip his “theories” excuses, lies and alibis to shreds with this thing called LOGIC AND TRUTH, something Placer County "professionals" lack.

(Think slowly about each point before you move on to the next point and keep the large over sized stuffed animal Baby Einstein worms in mind as you read.)

1) The abuser wants you all to believe the child is speaking of Baby Einstein’s worm:

The child is clearly speaking of 3 types of worms throughout the video. Baby Einstein’s worm is the first one she addresses which she states is green and orange. Anyone that has seen B. E. knows that is correct and accurate. The child then addresses “Daddy’s worm” which tastes “Yucky” and makes her cough, he has to wipe her mouth with like a napkin because of “Daddy’s worm” not B. E.’s worm. She states she sometimes gets mad at daddy and then further describes why. At the end she describes how daddy takes her to the store to see worms. She is very descriptive and very clear it is “daddy’s worm” not worm’s from the store or Baby Einsteins worm that tastes Yucky. Daddy thinks he is so smart and tried to confuse her by taking her to the store to see worms as she stated in the video. Too bad for him that his child is more intelligent than him. The child then concludes she doesn’t like ANY of the worms, but remember which one tastes Yucky. She gives the infamous worm an owner, her Daddy. She gives Baby Einstein’s worm an owner B. E., and she tells us where the other worms are that daddy made her go see…at the store. She addresses “daddy’s worm’s” size. She is holding her little baby doll in her arms and says its giant like her baby. Look at the size of her baby, it fits one of her arms. She says she tried to see him, he tries to look big. “He tries to look big” possibly like an erection? She says “she tried to see him” so apparently it was dark. She says “I tell daddy’s worm don't do that, its yucky, don't touch my mouth worm” so ask yourself what would Baby Einsteins over sized worm that she sees on TV be doing in her mouth? Makes zero sense right? And that she has to tell him “don't stop.”  Why would a child have to tel a daddy's worm "don't stop" when she clearly relayed to us that it was Yucky and she tells it don't touch my mouth worm? She further describes it makes her choke and cry and then she makes a gag noise to demonstrate. Then she describes she has to tell him “daddy get it off... he has to wipe it off with like a napkin.” This child descibed perfectly the act of oral sex in complete sequencial order entirely on her own in a 27 minute clip. No 2 1/2 year old child can be coached to act out, describe fellatio, gag, be afraid of the dark and her bed, and show signs of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in 27 minutes without some type of sexual abuse trauma having occurred to her. She described her perpetrator, it's “Daddy’s worm” that does it to her. She later states “daddy wants to have a baby.” Now why on this earth would a two year old describe these events perfectly then say her daddy wants to have a baby?

2) The Child Molester wants you to believe his Worm is an earth worm:

The child is very descriptive and clear. She described it’s size and it is not the size of an earth worm. Why would Daddy be sticking earth worms in her mouth anyway? That is abuse in itself. If you paid attention in the first of his theories it clearly debunks this theory of the child molesters too.

 3) The Child molester wants you to believe that she is speaking of gummy worms:

Listen to the child!! She tells you Baby Einstein’s worm is green and orange, not “Daddy’s worm.” Remember she tells you about “daddy’s worm” that she “tried to see him.” It’s kind of hard to see a worm that is getting shoved down your throat in the dark that makes you choke, gag and cry. “It tries to look big” so we know it changes sizes. Plus, kids love gummy worms. “Daddy’s worm” is “yucky,” she has to tell it “dont stop” and then she states “daddy wants a baby”!! That is no gummy worm! Why would a child think her daddy wants a baby with her? Think about it. Why would she have to tell a worm that she doesn’t like, “Don't stop”?

4) The Wormy Daddy wants you to believe the mother coached her:

Coaching is leading. It is the same as leading a witness with the answer in the question just like the rules in a courtroom. First of all nobody is even talking about the subject of “Daddy’s worm” in the video but ONLY the child entirely on her own. The only question asked is “What does the worm look like? There was nothing suggesting or leading in it. For those of you who do not understand what coaching is, a coaching example would be: Does the worm look like a banana? That would be suggesting an answer in the question. None of which ever happens throughout the entire 27 minutes of the “Daddy’s Worm” Video. The Mother and Aunt aren’t even talking. The child is insisting on telling them why she doesn’t want to go to bed. Any good Psychologist knows that children relate everything to their own knowledge and the world as they know it. They relate their own problems to their dolls having the same problems. The child in the video tells us that “Daddy’s worm makes her sick and cry and it makes her teddy bear sick and cry too.” She tells us that both her and her doll “don’t wants to go to bed right now.” At 2 1/2 she wouldn’t know the word penis, right?  Instead describes it the best way she knows how “Daddy’s worm.” Don’t forget also there were previous reports made to CPS by others than the mother of the child describing “daddy’s worm” as having hair like the hair on her head, it having one eye, and hurting her tongue. There are previous reports and restraining orders filed because “daddy hurts her pee pee” before she ever talked about daddy’s worm in her mouth. Child molesters only progress in the sick things they experiment on children. You can see the progression throughout this child’s statements and behaviors. You can only imagine what he is doing to her since he has her alone for two years. It is very clear to any attentive parent that it is impossible to coach a 2 1/2 year old child to talk for 27 minutes straight relating everything she says to her dolls and in sequential order of sexual abuse. Not one time throughout the entire video does she ask what mommy what did you say? The innotation (rise and fall of ones pitch) is clear this child is speaking of her own volition. Her innotation does not rise like she is questioning each statement like a coached child would sound like. This child is clearly un-coached unlike the child molester wants you to believe as one of his alibis. Also it is pitch dark in the room. You can tell that they have to turn on a glowing bear in order to see. Also the infrared is on in order to view the video. There is a tremendous amount of detail in the video alone to prove this child was indeed not coached or prompted in any way to say what she is describing about her “Daddy’s Worm” as the child molester falsely claims as his alibi.

 People wonder why the mother doesn't talk in the video. Well at every turn the molester cross fires accusations one being that she is making her say those things. She was told by the police not to talk or coach and to get it on tape. Prior to these disclosures were many from Aaliyah describing that daddy is hurting her pee pee and butt. She had made plenty of disclosures about daddy's worm having one eye, it having hair like the hair on her head and would ask her mother or aunt if they had a worm when she had seen them undressed. She obviously knows this worm's location...on a human body.

We ask if you do know him to remember his fairy tale stories he tells because they do change. Every little piece he describes will help play a part in this "puzzle" as Sergeant  Pecoraro called it when he lied to the Auburn Journal about "immediately" investigating this case.

Everybody please help stop this Child Molester and get this baby out of her abusers home. 

(This information was re-posted with the permission of SaveAaliyah.com)

DR EUGENE ROEDER PHD

THIS COURT APPOINTED PHD, DR ROEDER, HAS PUT MANY CHILDREN WITH PHYSICAL ABUSERS AND CHILD MOLESTERS. DR ROEDER WILL LIE ABOUT YOU, TWIST YOUR WORDS, WRITE A REPORT ON YOUR PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION AND LIE ABOUT THE RESULTS. YOU ARE PROBABLY ASKING YOURSELF WHY? WELL HE GETS PAID THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS TO HAVE THESE CASES SENT REPETITIVELY TO HIM. THIS MAN ALONG WITH THE REST OF PLACER COUNTY COURT PERSONNEL (CHRISTINE TAYLOR BROWN, SHARON SLOPER, COMMISSIONER DIRK AMARA, JUDGE FRANCES KEARNEY, JUDGE JEFFREY PENNEY, REBECCA BOWMAN, AND CHRIS TREJO, PLACER COUNTY CPS AND SERGEANT VICTOR PECORARO  JUST TO NAME A FEW)  ALL NEED TO BE TAKEN OUT OF THEIR POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY. YOU ARE PROBABLY THINKING YEAH RIGHT, THAT SOUNDS LIKE SOME HORROR STORY OUT OF A MOVIE, BUT ITS TRUE. LISTEN TO THESE SIX WOMEN TELL THEIR EXPERIENCE OF FAMILY COURT IN PLACER COUNTY CA WITH DR EUGENE ROEDER AND THE OTHER PERSONNEL. THESE WOMEN AND CHILDREN NEED ALL THE HELP THEY CAN GET TO EXPOSE THIS INSANE CORRUPTION TO SAVE THEIR CHILDREN FROM THEIR ABUSERS. THESE PERSONNEL ARE VIOLATING THE CIVIL RIGHTS WHILE CALLING THESE WOMEN DELUSIONAL AND TAKING THEIR CHILDREN FROM THEM AND ALL FOR WHAT? MONEY. TAKE A LISTEN, SPREAD THE LINK AND HELP GET MEDIA ATTENTION FOR THE SAKE OF THESE HELPLESS BABIES PUT IN HARM'S WAY BY PLACER COUNTY.
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/americanmotherspoliticalparty/2010/11/04/still-standing