AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT'S SERGEANT PECORARO'S LIES EXPOSED

Let me start un-weaving the web of deceit and deception for the sake of this baby and the mother. There are numerous letters and documents on HTTP://WWW.SAVEAALIYAH.COM that tell the story of this insidious injustice. There are court documents that are not uploaded for all to see, I would assume in the hopes that a trial will soon be heard. I have seen the court file, and what there is to read is all factual and real. Still, to this very day, I cannot find a lawful reason why this baby has been taken away from her protective mother. For all that there is to read there are definite subjects that stand out: 1. Sergeant Pecoraro 2. Lack of attorney for mother throughout the case 3. Lies from Amara (Father’s attorney) 4. Inconsistencies from the father 5. The mother refused to stop advocating for her child when repeatedly told to stop reporting the allegations 6. Numerous people not doing their jobs 7. Corruption and malfeasance 8. Lack of education/knowledge of abusers 9. Lack of proper and immediate action. 10. The fact the word “delusional” is constantly being used to describe this mother when clearly everyone around her says she is not.

Let’s start with Sergeant Pecoraro:

I am not a detective, but common sense, truth and evidence play a very important role in an investigation. Common sense would say to gather all the evidence, review it, interrogate the suspects, weigh all the information, consider the witnesses statements, ask all the pertinent questions and make an informed decision on the case. Does that sound about right to you all? I hope you all agree. It seems that Sergeant Pecoraro is lacking in the common sense department, to put it kindly. After reviewing these documents, I ponder how a detective can make a decision regarding his suspect without actually reading the documents/letters, viewing the videos or speaking to all of witnesses of this case. Oh, my apologies, he spoke with the father’s witnesses. But 5 months into the “investigation”, not one of the mother’s witnesses were called and asked to come in for an interview. Why wouldn’t the detective call the mother’s counselor? He could have obtained important information such as the mother’s mental condition, if she has symptoms of an abused woman, if she is consistent with her emotions and stories; the list goes on. Why wouldn’t he contact all of the doctors involved? The chiropractor has never been contacted, the one the child saw after being kicked in her back in early 2008. Sergeant Pecoraro claims to have interrogated the father, but what questions could he have asked him at that point in time? Did he ask “Are you molesting and beating your daughter?” What would anyone say to that, let alone a skilled manipulator and liar?

The investigation was opened in late January/early February 2008 after the baby came home to her mother with a bruise across her lower back and forehead stating her “mad daddy kicked her in the back and bonked her head on the table.” This was also the same time frame in which the child made her first sexual assault disclosures of her “daddy hurting pee pee and butt.” An MDIC interview was conducted in February 2008 and unsurprisingly, the threatened and frightened 2 year old baby did not speak. For those of you who do not know what an MDIC is, it is where they place the victim in a room with a stranger to be questioned in front of a glass window where the other professionals can watch. It is videotaped for prosecution purposes.
It is documented by the mother in the court file and pediatrician records that the first signs of sexual abuse were already a concern in late 2007. It is documented that the child’s behavior abruptly changed in early spring of 2007. The mother went to the Auburn Police Department to report incidents both in late 2007 and early 2008. In February she also went to the court house to file another restraining order (one of four restraining orders filed against the father). From the time the sexual abuse symptoms started to the disclosures documented; it took the baby roughly 9 months to be brave enough and able to tell her mommy. The baby’s vocabulary, at that time, was minimal. I find it strange how the professionals would expect a baby to then tell a stranger in an MDIC interview about sexual abuse when it took the baby roughly 9 months, depending on when the sexual abuse began and her ability to speak began, for her to tell someone she trusts and loves.

From January to June 2008 only the father’s witnesses were contacted, so let’s skip forward to June of 2008. In June, the mother was turned away from the Auburn Police Department when she brought the “Daddy’s Worm” video in on her camera. There was still an open investigation and they TURNED HER AWAY. Auburn Police Department made her turn the baby over to the father that same day for visitations, ignoring the mother’s desperate pleas and the video. THEY DID NOT WATCH IT! There is no reason as to why they did not view that video. Especially when they specifically told the mother to videotape the child when she spoke of what her father was doing. Who, in their right mind, would send away a mother who is crying, distraught and pleading with them to listen to her about what her baby is saying while there is an open investigation? The words biased, corruption and malfeasance are ringing in my ears. Where is their ethic code “To Serve and to Protect”? I see it as they served the mother with a restraining order to silence her and are protecting this father.
Keep in mind, the baby has claimed her “daddy hurt her pee pee and butt” and she had a bruise on her back and forehead. The baby stated that her mad daddy kicked her and she bonked head on the table. There were other disclosures also documented from the baby between January to June 2008 that you can find on the mother’s time line on saveaaliyah.com through the CPC link. Just know there are 11 other reported incidents and or disclosures made to CPS and not only reported by the mother. I will have to dig into that aspect for you all in a later article. In June 2008 after the baby was returned to the mother after visitation with the father for five days, she suspected abuse again and took the baby to the hospital. Sergeant Pecoraro was contacted by the emergency room doctor and refused the baby to be seen; he then asked to speak with the mother. He screamed at her to go home and he did not authorize the examination. What reason was given? None. Nothing. Nada. Just WHAT was this detective trying to do? I cannot, with good conscience, believe he knew that this baby was being abused and kept turning the mother away. There is something we are missing. But what? What is it that was told to the detective in order for him to have such disdain for this woman? From my understanding there was a screaming match over the phone in the hospital between the mother and detective. The mother was beyond upset at the rude, cold demeanor of this detective. He should have been gathering evidence for the investigation but instead shrugged her off. She knew none of her witnesses had been contacted in 5 months. Through questioning the detective, the mother found out that he had not even watched the 27 minute daddy’s worm video yet. If I were the mother my blood would have been boiling at this detective. It sounds backwards to me that the mother had to interrogate the detective! The mother’s boyfriend, Darrel Payne, decided to call and interrogate the detective and gave Sergeant Pecoraro a number of important key facts to the case that Pecoraro refused to obtain (read Darrel’s letter on saveaaliyah.com). In short, Pecoraro had told Darrel that a few of Connie’s friends already told him that she was coaching the child and the case was closed. This is the reason that the baby is now with her abusive father. Darrel, knowing the Bartsch’s for 15 years and being involved as a witness to the Bartsch’s lists of felonies, had already known who the detective was speaking of. A number of the Bartsch’s threats were made directly to Darrel and left on his voice mail. After Darrel’s heated discussion with Pecoraro informing him of more information he hadn’t gathered, Pecoraro FINALLY managed to make it a priority to watch the “daddy’s worm” video numerous days after it was given to APD. He then called and apologized to the mother for his deficiency of doing his job along with being outright rude to her on the phone at the hospital. He FINALLY scheduled the second MDIC interview for the child, but only after he had already placed the child back in the father’s home where she could have been brainwashed and abused again. The MDIC was weeks after the child disclosed about “daddy’s worm.” Essentially this “puzzle” as Pecoraro named it in the Auburn Journal, consists of 3 general sections: The Father’s witnesses, The Mother’s witnesses and The Evidence. Second graders could understand that Sergeant Pecoraro indeed did not “immediately,” nor properly, handle this case like he claims in the Auburn Journal. Undoubtedly, Sergeant Pecoraro nullified the evidence before it even had a chance. He placed this child back in her father’s home to be brainwashed before her interview, denied authorization to gather hard evidence, didn’t immediately watch the video, didn’t immediately put an EPO (Emergency Protective Order) to ensure protection of the child and didn’t contact the mother’s witnesses to get the other side to the story before he decided to interrogate the suspect. On top of that, what should have been him interrogating the mother, she reports he had his back towards her in his cubicle with his contact list up on his computer screen containing all father’s witnesses only. Two thirds of Sergeant Pecoraro’s puzzle has done a disappearing act here.

Allow me to recap the problem here for you, readers. The definition of “immediately” in Pecoraro’s terms must be, ignore a mother pleading to protect her baby after the baby disclosed about daddy’s worm, place the baby back in the father’s care for visitation for more brainwashing and abuse, decline getting any hard evidence at the emergency room, yelling at the distraught young woman after she hears her daughter tell a story of a living nightmare of her daddy’s yucky worm, he then watches the “daddy’s worm video” and then uses the father’s brainwashing of the child against her. If he would have done is job correctly, he may have had the significant keys to unlocking his “puzzle.” It is crucial and necessary to know the things the child had been saying beforehand because of what she might have said in her interview after being placed back in the father’s home. Especially, since the mother and aunt describe the baby repeating, like a broken record or mocking bird, “Mommy makes me say these things, I love Daddy, I love daddy’s worm, daddy said so” after the baby being returned to them from the father’s visitation. Those statements are completely opposite of what the baby was saying in the 27 minute video. They are shorter and in my opinion more believable as coached statements. Incredibly, plenty of details were not equated into the puzzle.

The felonies committed by Tanya and John Bartsch are clearly documented in the police reports done by adequate detectives of the Rocklin and Roseville Police Departments which contain imperative details to the Bedwell and Thompson case as well. The police report itself proves Tanya and John Bartsch’s credibility or better yet, lack thereof. It proves they premeditated and vindictively went to the Auburn Police Department with fabricated witness letters to the court, doctors and police. These letters are dated immediately following the date of their committed felonies. There is a new article posted about Ms Bedwell that has blatant lies to the public about her. I’m here to call out those lies. I have a copy of Tanya Bartsch’s fabricated letter. The statements used in the slanderous article about the mother are straight out of Tanya’s letter. The article clearly states the “friend” is not Tanya Bartsch. I ask the author of that article, then why the need to tell us it wasn’t from her? Traces of guilt possibly? Those statements in that article are lies. What credibility does the rest of that article have then? John and Tanya threatened to do anything to have Connie’s child taken from her. These criminals apparently are still at it and those of us with common sense can assume it’s because there is a police report proving their lies for the world to see. I can also confirm the mother does in fact have a doctor’s note, it’s reported she was in bed for a total of 9 days sick with the flu, and that would be the real reason she missed court recently.

Sergeant Pecoraro, lacking necessary detective abilities, thought when these two criminals, John and Tanya Bartsch who we know maliciously conned him and in combination with the results of the MDIC interview of the child; (where we are assuming that the child said the brainwashed comments she was stating to the mother and sister after being placed back in the father’s home), that it concluded the case again for a second time. By second time, I mean that he had already told Darrel Payne there was nothing left for him to review, yet there indeed was. He has closed the case again. It is apparent there is indeed more to review again otherwise all of the mother’s witnesses wouldn’t be claiming they were never contacted and the baby wouldn’t still be stating and exhibiting behaviors the way she is in the visitation reports. Hopefully by the third time this case closes it will be closed properly. They say the third time’s a charm.

So, the court then gives full custody to the father. 10 months of supervised visitations with the mother went by. In these visitations, the child was still disclosing signs of abuse through her play. The child tells her mother a number of consistent statements matching the mother’s story that you can read for yourselves in the reports on saveaaliyah.com. The mother claims the father realized the baby was still speaking of the abuse even after his threats to her. Dustin Thompson requested from the judge to have her visitations stopped. His request was denied which ruined his plans. Therefore, he found a way to attain his goal through finagling the visitation facility. The mother reports the father doesn’t want evidence to be documented against him through visitation reports. The reports prove all the father’s claims to be untrue.

This mother has been out of the puzzle for over a year. Yet, the puzzle is still missing pieces. How is that possible if the case was closed and solved? The child is talking about her tongue hurting, reacting negatively to nudity of dolls, claiming how mad her daddy is, clinging to her mommy, refusing the bathroom, claiming statements that the mother is scary and that someone made her say that, she’s still mentioning death and the burying of her toys all right there in those visitation reports. Great work Sergeant Pecoraro. One can only hope that you would go to your commanding officer, tell him/her of your mistakes in the “investigation,” ask for it to be re-investigated and do it properly this time. John and Tanya Bartsch saying the mother coached this little girl is absurd. The baby spoke an entire 27 minutes on her own. Please right your wrongs, for the sake of this baby ONLY!

This case is a nightmare from beginning to end. From what’s been reported to me, I blame the majority of this disaster on this detective. Everybody was counting on him, who should be aware of such charming manipulative criminals to not speak the truth in this case, but he failed miserably. Justice is crying in the streets for this baby. This child does not deserve to suffer for others ignorance and pride.
There are more articles to be written involving the Placer County D.A., Placer County CPS, abuse in general, child molester’s tactics and more facts on the way. To inform the readers, there is a descriptive time line to all of these details mentioned. I decided to leave exact dates and times out for the sake of a trial. Child molesters are intelligent creatures and I do not want to jeopardize the case for this child and mother by providing too much information to give any opportunity for more alibis to be invented by the unjust. The time line is well put together and matches all dates and time frames of the mother’s witnesses, claims and her court declarations; I’m afraid that this is not a delusional woman, but that of a delusional county.

Thank you to all who read. I hope to get the facts out here fast enough to get this case into the right hands where someone can erupt the Placer County corruption wide open and to get this baby back into her protective mother’s arms.

Troy (re-posted with permission of Troy)

SAVE AALIYAH FROM "DADDY'S (DUSTIN THOMPSON'S) WORM"

 Above is a picture of the Baby Einstein's Worm. There is also a green and orange worm in one of the videos of Baby Einstein that resembles more of a dinosaur which is the worm Aaliyah also relays information about due to her fears of all worms. What would cause a child to fear all worms? Aaliyah began to be afraid of all worms when the sexual abuse began. She became afraid of the dark, afraid of her bed, regressed in potty training, began to think the world was dangerous, needed a flashlight and nightlight to sleep with and began having extremely bad nightmares that would keep her awake at night. The child molester wants to try to convince anybody that he can that “Daddy’s Worm” is anything but his penis. So right here we will rip his “theories” excuses, lies and alibis to shreds with this thing called LOGIC AND TRUTH, something Placer County "professionals" lack.

(Think slowly about each point before you move on to the next point and keep the large over sized stuffed animal Baby Einstein worms in mind as you read.)

1) The abuser wants you all to believe the child is speaking of Baby Einstein’s worm:

The child is clearly speaking of 3 types of worms throughout the video. Baby Einstein’s worm is the first one she addresses which she states is green and orange. Anyone that has seen B. E. knows that is correct and accurate. The child then addresses “Daddy’s worm” which tastes “Yucky” and makes her cough, he has to wipe her mouth with like a napkin because of “Daddy’s worm” not B. E.’s worm. She states she sometimes gets mad at daddy and then further describes why. At the end she describes how daddy takes her to the store to see worms. She is very descriptive and very clear it is “daddy’s worm” not worm’s from the store or Baby Einsteins worm that tastes Yucky. Daddy thinks he is so smart and tried to confuse her by taking her to the store to see worms as she stated in the video. Too bad for him that his child is more intelligent than him. The child then concludes she doesn’t like ANY of the worms, but remember which one tastes Yucky. She gives the infamous worm an owner, her Daddy. She gives Baby Einstein’s worm an owner B. E., and she tells us where the other worms are that daddy made her go see…at the store. She addresses “daddy’s worm’s” size. She is holding her little baby doll in her arms and says its giant like her baby. Look at the size of her baby, it fits one of her arms. She says she tried to see him, he tries to look big. “He tries to look big” possibly like an erection? She says “she tried to see him” so apparently it was dark. She says “I tell daddy’s worm don't do that, its yucky, don't touch my mouth worm” so ask yourself what would Baby Einsteins over sized worm that she sees on TV be doing in her mouth? Makes zero sense right? And that she has to tell him “don't stop.”  Why would a child have to tel a daddy's worm "don't stop" when she clearly relayed to us that it was Yucky and she tells it don't touch my mouth worm? She further describes it makes her choke and cry and then she makes a gag noise to demonstrate. Then she describes she has to tell him “daddy get it off... he has to wipe it off with like a napkin.” This child descibed perfectly the act of oral sex in complete sequencial order entirely on her own in a 27 minute clip. No 2 1/2 year old child can be coached to act out, describe fellatio, gag, be afraid of the dark and her bed, and show signs of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in 27 minutes without some type of sexual abuse trauma having occurred to her. She described her perpetrator, it's “Daddy’s worm” that does it to her. She later states “daddy wants to have a baby.” Now why on this earth would a two year old describe these events perfectly then say her daddy wants to have a baby?

2) The Child Molester wants you to believe his Worm is an earth worm:

The child is very descriptive and clear. She described it’s size and it is not the size of an earth worm. Why would Daddy be sticking earth worms in her mouth anyway? That is abuse in itself. If you paid attention in the first of his theories it clearly debunks this theory of the child molesters too.

 3) The Child molester wants you to believe that she is speaking of gummy worms:

Listen to the child!! She tells you Baby Einstein’s worm is green and orange, not “Daddy’s worm.” Remember she tells you about “daddy’s worm” that she “tried to see him.” It’s kind of hard to see a worm that is getting shoved down your throat in the dark that makes you choke, gag and cry. “It tries to look big” so we know it changes sizes. Plus, kids love gummy worms. “Daddy’s worm” is “yucky,” she has to tell it “dont stop” and then she states “daddy wants a baby”!! That is no gummy worm! Why would a child think her daddy wants a baby with her? Think about it. Why would she have to tell a worm that she doesn’t like, “Don't stop”?

4) The Wormy Daddy wants you to believe the mother coached her:

Coaching is leading. It is the same as leading a witness with the answer in the question just like the rules in a courtroom. First of all nobody is even talking about the subject of “Daddy’s worm” in the video but ONLY the child entirely on her own. The only question asked is “What does the worm look like? There was nothing suggesting or leading in it. For those of you who do not understand what coaching is, a coaching example would be: Does the worm look like a banana? That would be suggesting an answer in the question. None of which ever happens throughout the entire 27 minutes of the “Daddy’s Worm” Video. The Mother and Aunt aren’t even talking. The child is insisting on telling them why she doesn’t want to go to bed. Any good Psychologist knows that children relate everything to their own knowledge and the world as they know it. They relate their own problems to their dolls having the same problems. The child in the video tells us that “Daddy’s worm makes her sick and cry and it makes her teddy bear sick and cry too.” She tells us that both her and her doll “don’t wants to go to bed right now.” At 2 1/2 she wouldn’t know the word penis, right?  Instead describes it the best way she knows how “Daddy’s worm.” Don’t forget also there were previous reports made to CPS by others than the mother of the child describing “daddy’s worm” as having hair like the hair on her head, it having one eye, and hurting her tongue. There are previous reports and restraining orders filed because “daddy hurts her pee pee” before she ever talked about daddy’s worm in her mouth. Child molesters only progress in the sick things they experiment on children. You can see the progression throughout this child’s statements and behaviors. You can only imagine what he is doing to her since he has her alone for two years. It is very clear to any attentive parent that it is impossible to coach a 2 1/2 year old child to talk for 27 minutes straight relating everything she says to her dolls and in sequential order of sexual abuse. Not one time throughout the entire video does she ask what mommy what did you say? The innotation (rise and fall of ones pitch) is clear this child is speaking of her own volition. Her innotation does not rise like she is questioning each statement like a coached child would sound like. This child is clearly un-coached unlike the child molester wants you to believe as one of his alibis. Also it is pitch dark in the room. You can tell that they have to turn on a glowing bear in order to see. Also the infrared is on in order to view the video. There is a tremendous amount of detail in the video alone to prove this child was indeed not coached or prompted in any way to say what she is describing about her “Daddy’s Worm” as the child molester falsely claims as his alibi.

 People wonder why the mother doesn't talk in the video. Well at every turn the molester cross fires accusations one being that she is making her say those things. She was told by the police not to talk or coach and to get it on tape. Prior to these disclosures were many from Aaliyah describing that daddy is hurting her pee pee and butt. She had made plenty of disclosures about daddy's worm having one eye, it having hair like the hair on her head and would ask her mother or aunt if they had a worm when she had seen them undressed. She obviously knows this worm's location...on a human body.

We ask if you do know him to remember his fairy tale stories he tells because they do change. Every little piece he describes will help play a part in this "puzzle" as Sergeant  Pecoraro called it when he lied to the Auburn Journal about "immediately" investigating this case.

Everybody please help stop this Child Molester and get this baby out of her abusers home. 

(This information was re-posted with the permission of SaveAaliyah.com)

DR EUGENE ROEDER PHD

THIS COURT APPOINTED PHD, DR ROEDER, HAS PUT MANY CHILDREN WITH PHYSICAL ABUSERS AND CHILD MOLESTERS. DR ROEDER WILL LIE ABOUT YOU, TWIST YOUR WORDS, WRITE A REPORT ON YOUR PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION AND LIE ABOUT THE RESULTS. YOU ARE PROBABLY ASKING YOURSELF WHY? WELL HE GETS PAID THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS TO HAVE THESE CASES SENT REPETITIVELY TO HIM. THIS MAN ALONG WITH THE REST OF PLACER COUNTY COURT PERSONNEL (CHRISTINE TAYLOR BROWN, SHARON SLOPER, COMMISSIONER DIRK AMARA, JUDGE FRANCES KEARNEY, JUDGE JEFFREY PENNEY, REBECCA BOWMAN, AND CHRIS TREJO, PLACER COUNTY CPS AND SERGEANT VICTOR PECORARO  JUST TO NAME A FEW)  ALL NEED TO BE TAKEN OUT OF THEIR POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY. YOU ARE PROBABLY THINKING YEAH RIGHT, THAT SOUNDS LIKE SOME HORROR STORY OUT OF A MOVIE, BUT ITS TRUE. LISTEN TO THESE SIX WOMEN TELL THEIR EXPERIENCE OF FAMILY COURT IN PLACER COUNTY CA WITH DR EUGENE ROEDER AND THE OTHER PERSONNEL. THESE WOMEN AND CHILDREN NEED ALL THE HELP THEY CAN GET TO EXPOSE THIS INSANE CORRUPTION TO SAVE THEIR CHILDREN FROM THEIR ABUSERS. THESE PERSONNEL ARE VIOLATING THE CIVIL RIGHTS WHILE CALLING THESE WOMEN DELUSIONAL AND TAKING THEIR CHILDREN FROM THEM AND ALL FOR WHAT? MONEY. TAKE A LISTEN, SPREAD THE LINK AND HELP GET MEDIA ATTENTION FOR THE SAKE OF THESE HELPLESS BABIES PUT IN HARM'S WAY BY PLACER COUNTY.
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/americanmotherspoliticalparty/2010/11/04/still-standing